acf-code-field
domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init
action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/propertyinsuranc/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114Insurance policies impose a duty on insureds to cooperate with the insurer\u2019s investigation of a claim. An insured\u2019s duty to cooperate encompasses the insured\u2019s obligation to appear for an examination under oath (\u201cEUO\u201d), if requested, and to provide documentation verifying the loss. \u201cCooperation clauses\u201d generally have been held to be material provisions of insurance policies with compliance therewith a condition precedent to coverage.<\/p>\n
In order to relieve itself of liability under the insurance policy, the insurer generally must prove more than the cooperation clause was breached. For instance, in my home state of New Jersey, coverage may only be forfeited upon a finding that there was a material and willful breach of the insured\u2019s duty to cooperate with the insurer\u2019s investigation that materially diluted the insurer\u2019s ability to evaluate the claim.1<\/sup> Courts interpreting this standard have found that failure of insureds to produce income tax records and corporate books of companies controlled by them at the request of the insurers was a material breach of the policies that precluded coverage on theft and arson claims.<\/p>\n In a recent case,2<\/sup> a New York appeals court held that a lower court improperly dismissed an insured\u2019s claim for breach of the cooperation clause in the policy. In that case, the insured\u2019s personal property was destroyed by a fire at the property. The insurer disclaimed coverage for the insured\u2019s personal property on the ground that the plaintiff failed to adhere to the cooperation clause of the policy. Specifically, the insurer claimed that the insured did not provide it with requested purchase documents to support much of the insured\u2019s claim for lost contents. In response, the insured maintained that he was unable to reconstruct old invoices without knowing the date of purchase of each item. Ultimately, the court found that there was not an unexcused and willful refusal by the insured to comply with the policy\u2019s cooperation clause.<\/p>\n In sum, following a loss, an insured should produce documents in response to specific, material and reasonable requests by insurers or risk forfeiting coverage under the policy. If you believe your claim was improperly denied based upon an alleged failure to cooperate with your insurer following a claim, contact your local Merlin Law Group attorneys<\/a>. Insurance policies impose a duty on insureds to cooperate with the insurer\u2019s investigation of a claim. An insured\u2019s duty to cooperate encompasses the insured\u2019s obligation to appear for an examination under oath (\u201cEUO\u201d), if requested, and to provide documentation verifying the loss. \u201cCooperation clauses\u201d generally have been held to be material provisions of insurance policies …<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":36,"featured_media":28680,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[193,203,4,204],"class_list":["post-28678","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-cooperation-clause","tag-duty-to-cooperate","tag-insurance","tag-postloss-duties"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\n
\n_______________________________________
\n1<\/sup> DiFrancisco v. Chubb Ins. Co.<\/em>, 283 N.J. Super. 601 (App. Div. 1995)<\/a>.
\n2<\/sup> Jahinger v. Tri-State Consumer Ins. Co.<\/em>, 2020 WL 7759483 (N.Y.S.3d 2020)<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"